Wikibooks:Requests for permissions
From Wikibooks, the open-content textbooks collection
| Wikibooks Discussion Rooms | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discussion | Administrative Help |
Announcements | Permissions | Page Deletion | Featured Books |
| Reading Room | Administrative Assistance | Bulletin Board | Requests for Permissions | Deletion — Undeletion | Nominations |
To nominate a user (including yourself), add their username to the appropriate section below. Please explain why you feel the nominated user would be a good choice. All registered Wikibookians may comment, and provide arguments in support or opposition.
All rights available on Wikibooks are handled here, including rollback, editor, reviewer, administrator, bureaucrat, CheckUser, and bot flags. Candidates will need to demonstrate a need for the access. For the bot flag, technical information about the bot may be requested. See the specific requirements for each type of access on their respective pages.
All contributors will receive the editor flag automatically once they meet the criteria. Requests should be made here only if you cannot meet the requirements (for example, you have been blocked in the past). Administrators may use their best judgement in granting the editor and rollback flags. All other tools require community consensus, as determined by a bureaucrat. Access to CheckUser is governed by meta:CheckUser policy. After about one week, if there is consensus to grant access, then a bureaucrat will make it so and record the fact here. If not, a bureaucrat may refuse to grant the rights and the request will remain until a consensus is reached.
|
|
[edit] Requests for permissions
 |
Note: When adding nominations, please use the format ==={{user3|Username}} (right requested)=== followed by the nomination. |
[edit] DavidLevinson ( talk | email | contribs | logs) (Reviewer)
I would like to request permission as a reviewer. I have been working on books in the transportation area, namely Fundamentals of Transportation and Transportation Economics. Thanks, dml (talk) 21:36, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'd prefer for you to wait until the system automatically promotes you to Editor. Thanks — Mike.lifeguard | talk 22:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- I'm not an expert, maybe one will come by soon and answer this correctly, but I think the software is looking for the criteria to be met since Flagged Revisions was switched on. So, you'd need a 15 day edit interval, 10 recent content edits on 10 unique pages and at least 50 edit summaries since 15 November 08. Maybe you just need a few more edits - or maybe I'm talking rubbish! Unusual? Quite TalkQu 14:11, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
-
[edit] QuiteUnusual ( talk | email | contribs | logs) (Rollbacker)
Has been doing good antivandalism work over the past while. Rollback would make their life easier. — Mike.lifeguard | talk 21:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- I accept, thank you Unusual? Quite TalkQu 21:39, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Support I just thinking the same thing. He's a hard worker who does his homework. An asset to the community. --Swift (talk) 22:40, 6 January 2009 (UTC)- Support Enthusiastically. --Jomegat (talk) 23:08, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Removal of access
|
Note: You may request removal of your own rights at meta:Steward requests/Permissions. Requests to remove others' rights should be placed here, whether due to inactivity, or abuse. |
- None currently.
